Trillanes amnesty ‘absolute, irrevocable’ – Lagman

Mara Cepeda

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

Trillanes amnesty ‘absolute, irrevocable’ – Lagman
There is 'no legal and factual basis' for President Rodrigo Duterte to revoke Senator Antonio Trillanes IV's amnesty, according to Albay 1st District Representative Edcel Lagman

MANILA, Philippines – Albay 1st District Representative Edcel Lagman said President Rodrigo Duterte’s revocation of the amnesty granted to Senator Antonio Trillanes IV has “no legal and factual basis.”

On Tuesday, September 4, the lawyer turned lawmaker said then-president Benigno Aquino III’s Proclamation No. 75, the basis of an amnesty grant to Trillanes and other mutineers in 2011, does not provide for any revocation clause.

“Consequently, the reported revocation by President Rodrigo Duterte of the amnesty granted to Senator Antonio Trillanes has no legal and factual basis,” said Lagman.

On August 31, Duterte signed Proclamation No. 572 declaring Trillanes’ amnesty “void ab initio.” The proclamation was published in the Manila Times on Tuesday.

Trillanes already vowed to face arrest, saying he is not afraid of Duterte.

The soldier turned senator had led Magdalo soldiers in staging the 2003 Oakwood mutiny and 2007 Manila Peninsula siege against the administration of then-president and now Speaker Gloria Macapagal Arroyo.

Lagman explained that because Section 19, Article VII of the 1987 Constitution states that the presidential declaration of amnesty needs the concurrence of the majority of all members of both the House and the Senate, revocation, “if allowable, needs the same congressional concurrence.”

But Justice Secretary Menardo Guevarra disagrees. He said Congress’ concurrence is not needed because Trillanes’ amnesty was “void ab initio,” which means it never had a legal effect from the start.

Section 19, Article VII of the 1987 Constitution states that the President has the “power to grant amnesty with the concurrence of a majority of all the Members of the Congress.” But it is silent on the requirement to revoke the amnesty.

“Amnesty, which obliterates past offenses, is final, absolute, and irrevocable unlike a presidential conditional pardon. Alleged present transgressions of a grantee are immaterial and do not militate against the grant of amnesty,” said Lagman.

Magdalo Representative Gary Alejano, who had mutineered against the Arroyo presidency with Trillanes, shared the same sentiments. He called Duterte’s order against Trillanes a “clear act of revenge.”

Malacañang, however, said there was “nothing political” in the order.

Follow the developments here:


Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Download the Rappler App!
Clothing, Apparel, Person


Mara Cepeda

Mara Cepeda specializes in stories about politics and local governance. She covers the Office of the Vice President, the Senate, and the Philippine opposition. She is a 2021 fellow of the Asia Journalism Fellowship and the Reham al-Farra Memorial Journalism Fellowship of the UN. Got tips? Email her at or tweet @maracepeda.