Philippine anti-terrorism law

10th petition vs anti-terror law assails violation of right to bail

Rambo Talabong
The petition asks the Supreme Court to issue a restraining order and to declare as unconstitutional the Anti-Terror Law

A coalition of progressive groups and stakeholders from different sectors led by the National Union of Peoples Lawyers (NUPL) filed on Sunday, July 19, the 10th petition against the Anti-Terror Law, further stepping up the legal resistance to a measure critics say undermine the people’s basic human rights.

Some 44 leaders and members of the groups, including Bagong Alyansang Makabayan, Movement Against Tyranny, and Karapatan electronically filed their petition, which echoed previous petitions in slamming the law’s vagueness and potential for abuse.

The NUPL petition asked the Supreme Court to issue a status quo ante order or a temporary restraining order and/or a writ of preliminary injunction. It also asked that the High Court declare the law as unconstitutional in its entirety.

What’s new?

The petition added that the law violated a person’s right to bail and the right to travel.

Under the contested Anti-Terror Law, people charged with bailable offenses such as inciting to terrorism can be placed under house arrest. This is a violation of one’s constitutional right to bail, according to retired Supreme Court justice Antonio Carpio.

How is it a violation?

Bails are granted by courts to allow the accused to travel. The Anti-Terror Law, however, allows authorities to continuously restrict the movement of the accused through house arrest and within the locality where they are being tried.

The bailable crimes under the Anti-Terror Law are threat to commit terrorism, proposal to commit terrorism, and inciting to commit terrorism—offenses that can be abused by the government to stifle dissent, according to the petitioners.

“Taking into account the gravity of the penalties prescribed under the law, as well as its other provisions that allow for the warrantless arrest and the prolonged detention of suspects, permitting the government to treat ‘advocacy, protest, dissent, stoppage of work, industrial or mass action, and other similar exercises of civil and political rights’ as terrorism based on the speaker’s or actor’s purported intent is an extremely dangerous proposition,” the NUPL said in a statement.

The following are the petitions against the Anti-Terror Law filed with the Supreme Court:
  1. Atty Howie Calleja and group
  2. Albay 1st District Representative Edcel Lagman
  3. Far Eastern University Institute of Law
  4. Makabayan bloc
  5. Former OGCC chief Rudolf Jurado
  6. Center for Trade Union and Human Rights
  7. Framers of the Constitution with Ateneo and Xavier lawyers 
  8. Sanlakas party list
  9. Labor groups
  10. NUPL and progressive groups


Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.


Rambo Talabong

Rambo Talabong covers the House of Representatives and local governments for Rappler. Prior to this, he covered security and crime. He was named Jaime V. Ongpin Fellow in 2019 for his reporting on President Rodrigo Duterte’s war on drugs. In 2021, he was selected as a journalism fellow by the Fellowships at Auschwitz for the Study of Professional Ethics.