FALSE: Filipino ‘royal family’ ruled over pre-colonial ‘Maharlika kingdom’


This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

FALSE: Filipino ‘royal family’ ruled over pre-colonial ‘Maharlika kingdom’
There are no records that show proof of a pre-colonial Filipino royal family that ruled over a kingdom called Maharlika, which was made up of the Philippines, Brunei, South Borneo, Hawaii, the Spratly Islands, and Sabah

Claim: A post on Facebook dated September 24, 2018 states that former president Ferdinand Marcos was paid in gold by the “Tallano royal family of the Philippines” for being their lawyer.

The so-called royal family, whose last name is Tallano, is said to have ruled over a kingdom called Maharlika that was made up of the Philippines, Brunei, South Borneo, Hawaii, the Spratly Islands, and Sabah before Spain colonized our country.

They allegedly “owned” our country until the mid-18th century.

Our national hero Jose Rizal was supposedly a direct descendant of the Tallano family.

The Tallanos was said to have paid Marcos “192 thousand tons of gold” because they hired him to be their lawyer before he became a politician.

Accompanying the post is a photo of Marcos and his wife, former first lady Imelda Marcos, superimposed over a photo of gold bars. Another photo superimposed over the gold bars is of President Rodrigo Duterte. Text on the photo reads: “Marcos gold will save the world!”

The post has more than 79,000 shares and more than 5,000 comments as of posting. It was emailed to us to check through factcheck@rappler.com. 

Rating: FALSE

The Facts: There is no historical proof that a royal family called Tallano ruled over a kingdom called Maharlika during pre-colonial Philippines.

Rappler consulted historian and Assistant Professorial Lecturer of History at De La Salle University Xiao Chua, and he presented 5 questions in response to the post:

1. Where is the title?

There are no land titles that prove that a Tallano family owns the entire Philippine archipelago. 

According to Inquirer.net, Julian Tallano claimed that he was the heir Rajah Soliman and Lapu-Lapu and a descendant of King Luisong Tagean. 

In 2002, the Court of Appeals (CA) issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) on 3 Pasay court rulings that validated Tallano’s claim. These rulings were by Pasay City Judge Ernesto Reyes on July 7, 1997, July 11, 2001, and October 8, 2001. 

A report about the TRO published by the Philippine Star in 2002 says that Office of the Solicitor General filed a petition with the CA assailing the validity of the Pasay court’s ruling and the 3 fake titles that laid claim to the Philippines.

According to the Star, the petition explained that the “sheer area covered constitutes more than conclusive evidence regarding the spurious character of said titles…”

2. Is there a mention of the name Tallano in any documents from the Spanish regime? From the Blair and Robertson collection of documents? 3. Was there a historical document from Spanish period citing Maharlika as a place name in the Philippines?

Emma Helen Blair and James Alexander Robertson edited a 55 volume book of primary source Philippine history documents that covers 1493 to 1898.

The words “Tallano” and “Maharlika” are not mentioned in the Blair and Robertson collection collection of documents in relation to the name of a place or kingdom.

There are also no records that show that one family in the Philippines ruled over the other datus’ kingdoms on the archipelago.

In historian William Henry Scott’s Looking for the Prehispanic Filipino, published in 1992, he spoke about the 4 societal classes that existed during the pre-colonial era. He said that the Spaniards thought datus were kings – until they realized that they did not have power over other kingdoms or other datus.

The Marcos-approved history book Tadhana: The History of the Filipino People also says that by the time navigator Miguel Lopez de Legazpi set foot in the Philippines, the country’s many groups were not unified: “A pan-Filipino state however had yet to emerge, although in response to grave, strange, if exciting forces indigenous sates of varying sizes had emerged.”

4. If they were lawyered by Ferdinand Marcos and Jose W. Diokno, and if it was such a big case, was there a mention of the Tallanos in any of their writings, speeches, or credible biographies?

Historian and Ateneo de Manila University history professor Ambeth Ocampo, who has Marcos’ diaries, called the claim about the Tallano family “doubtful.”

In biographies of Marcos on the Encyclopedia Britannica website, the Biography.com website, the Department of National Defense website, and the Senate website, there is no mention of the Tallano family. 

5. If it was such a big Supreme Court case, was there a SCRA or any documents to be found in the Supreme Court about an alleged decision?

A search for the name “Tallano” on the Supreme Court website, the LawPhil website, and the Chan Robles Virtual Law Library do not provide any decisions from before 1949 that involved both Tallano and Marcos. – Rappler.com

Keep us aware of suspicious Facebook pages, groups, accounts, websites, articles, or photos in your network by contacting us at factcheck@rappler.com. Let us battle disinformation one Fact Check at a time.

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Download the Rappler App!