3 years on, Bong Go still wrongly thinks CHR ‘protects’ only criminals

Jodesz Gavilan

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

3 years on, Bong Go still wrongly thinks CHR ‘protects’ only criminals
Commission on Human Rights Chairperson Chito Gascon says they are mandated to remind the government to punish criminals 'in accordance with the rule of law'

Halfway through the administration and after numerous explainers on the issue, Senator Christopher “Bong” Go still wrongly thinks the Commission on Human Right (CHR) protects only criminals. 

During the plenary deliberations on the CHR’s budget for 2020, the former special assistant to President Rodrigo Duterte complained about the alleged treatment by the Commission of policemen accused of committing human rights violations under the administration’s violent and bloody war on drugs. 

To emphasize his point, the senator even played a 15-minute video highlighting alleged victims of crimes, the efforts of government agencies against illegal drugs, ending with a clip of Duterte proclaiming that he will be happy to die to protect the next generation. 

Go went as far as asking CHR Chairperson Chito Gascon to choose between two completely not mutually exclusive things: “Anong mas importante sa inyo, buhay ng inosenteng Filipino o buhay ng kriminal (What’s more important to you, the lives of innocent Filipinos or the lives of criminals)?”

Go even asked the Senate to suspend its rules, to allow Gascon to directly answer his question.

Replying, Gascon said that all Filipinos are covered by the Bill of Rights as established in the 1987 Philippine Constitution. (READ: Hate human rights? They protect freedoms you enjoy

Ang biktima ay may karapatan po sila, ang mga salarin, suspected criminals, sang-ayon po sa ating bill of rights, ay may minimum treatment required,” he said. “Ang aming pakay ay mapaalala sa ating mga partners sa gobyerno na gawin nito ang kanilang maaaring gawin sang-ayon sa batas.”

(Based on our bill of rights, victims, criminals, suspected criminals require minimum treatment. Our objective is to remind our partners in government that they should do what they can in accordance with the law.) 

“All persons are guaranteed rights to due process…so if there’s a crime, then definitely the state must move in to punish the criminal, but the criminal must be punished in accordance with the rule of law,” Gascon added. 

Established under the 1987 Philippine Constitution, the CHR is an independent body that ensures the protection of human rights as guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. It conducts investigations and also provides assistance and legal measures for the protection of these rights, as guided by Section 18, Article XIII.

Go’s line of questioning isn’t new. It has been the same message that Duterte and his allies have used against the CHR since 2016, mostly as retribution for its criticism of the drug war. 

The President, based on his speeches throughout the years, painted the CHR as a hindrance to the administration’s promise of change, even going as far as openly threatening human rights advocates. (READ: Human rights: How to deal with Duterte, the biggest challenge?

Until when will administration allies intentionally sell the idea that protecting innocent lives and respecting human rights cannot coexist? The public can only speculate.  – Rappler.com

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Download the Rappler App!
Natsu Ando


Jodesz Gavilan

Jodesz Gavilan is a writer and researcher for Rappler and its investigative arm, Newsbreak. She covers human rights and impunity beats, producing in-depth and investigative reports particularly on the quest for justice of victims of former president Rodrigo Duterte’s war on drugs and war on dissent.