EXPLAINER: Epic Games verdict adds to Google’s global antitrust woes


This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

EXPLAINER: Epic Games verdict adds to Google’s global antitrust woes

GOOGLE. A logo is pictured at Google's European Engineering Center in Zurich, Switzerland July 19, 2018

Arnd Wiegmann/Reuters

Google also faces lawsuits from advertisers and publishers, and the US government on cases regarding its search and advertising dominance, and a $2.6 billion fine in the EU for its shopping services

“Fortnite” maker Epic Games won a major antitrust trial against Alphabet’s Google in San Francisco, persuading a federal jury on Monday that some of the technology giant’s rules for its app Play store violated US competition law.

Here’s a look at what’s next in the case, and other major antitrust headaches facing Google.

What was the verdict?

The jury said, after just three hours of deliberations, that Google’s tight controls on its Play store amounted to an illegal monopoly over both app distribution to Android users and in-app payment processing. Epic did not ask the court for monetary damages.

A judge had ruled earlier that Google improperly deleted internal online “chat” logs relevant to Epic’s claims. The jury was told that the evidence would have been unfavorable to Google.

What comes next?

US District Judge James Donato in January will hear dueling arguments on Epic’s request for a court order to rewrite how Google operates the Play store. Google could object that whatever changes Epic proposes are too sweeping.

Google said it will appeal the jury’s verdict. It could also appeal Donato’s eventual decision on Epic’s requested remedies, potentially teeing up years of additional litigation.

What about Epic’s case against Apple?

Google’s appeal will land in the San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals – the same court that heard Epic’s separate 2020 antitrust case against Apple over its App Store rules.

The appeals court in April largely ruled for Apple, upholding a 2021 decision by US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers that said Apple’s app rules did not violate antitrust law.

Legal scholars noted that the facts of the two cases were distinct, and said a key difference was that the case against Apple was decided by the judge directly, with no jury.

Epic’s bid to revive the Apple case is now pending at the US Supreme Court. Apple also appealed a part of the court’s order that would require it to make some changes to its App Store.

What other antitrust cases is Google fighting?

Google faces an array of private civil antitrust lawsuits from US advertisers and publishers, in addition to US government claims challenging its search and advertising technology practices.

In the EU, Google is trying to overturn a $2.6 billion antitrust fine imposed by the top court for alleged market abuses related to its shopping service.

The verdict in Epic Games’ case does not directly affect those other cases, but it could spur other potential plaintiffs such as businesses and app developers to band together in a class action, antitrust lawyers said.

Google likely faces a jury trial next year in Virginia in a case brought by the US Justice Department and a group of states over its dominance in digital advertising. Google has denied any wrongdoing. –

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI
Download the Rappler App!