Nepal’s long-delayed parliament set for first meeting

Agence France-Presse

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

A newly-elected constituent assembly will convene in Kathmandu, nearly a month after the former ruling Maoist party dropped a boycott threat

KATHMANDU, Nepal – Nepalese lawmakers begin a new push Wednesday, January 22, to finally agree on a constitution that can deliver stability to the Himalayan nation, still divided by the legacy of a decade-long civil war.

A newly-elected constituent assembly will convene in Kathmandu, nearly a month after the former ruling Maoist party dropped a boycott threat, raising hopes of breaking a prolonged deadlock within a year as promised by lawmakers.

However a failure by the two other major parties – the Nepali Congress and the Unified Marxist-Leninist (UML) – to agree on a coalition government has dampened some of that hope and underlined the difficulties of reaching a consensus.

The Congress, which won most seats in the November 19 election, is still expected to form the next government – possibly in a coalition with the UML, which placed second.

Nepal has been in political limbo for nearly two years, since the dissolution of the country’s first constituent assembly.

The Maoists came to power in 2008 after a landslide election victory, two years after signing a deal to end a decade-long insurgency which also saw King Gyanendra step down.

But the ensuing four years were marked by a series of short-term coalition governments, mainly led by the Maoists, and the first assembly broke up amid rancor in May 2012.

The Maoists’ humiliating loss in November’s polls and initial threat to boycott the new assembly over electoral fraud claims raised fears that the new body, which also acts as a parliament, would be beset with similar woes.

But analysts say all the main parties know they cannot afford to allow their disagreements over the terms of the constitution to go on much longer.

‘No other option’

“The parties will have to work things out, they have no other option, no other way out,” Lok Raj Baral, executive chairman of Kathmandu’s Nepal Centre for Contemporary Studies, told Agence France-Presse.

The main differences between the parties on the constitution revolve around state boundaries and the powers of the president.

Efforts to agree on a new coalition have also snagged over disagreements about the carve-up of key posts and ministries.

Nepalese newspapers urged the parties to strive to overcome their differences and live up to campaign promises to draw up a draft of the new constitution within a year of parliament convening.

In an editorial entitled “364 Days Left”, the Annapurna Post said “this time, lawmakers should spend less time on power games and focus on writing the constitution (within a year)”.

The best-selling Kantipur Daily said in an editorial that it was time for Nepalese politicians to “prove… that they have learned lessons from past failures”.

Baral said none of the disagreements should be so serious as to trigger another drawn-out impasse.

“This sort of squabbling is to be expected, it should not be taken too seriously,” he said. “Of course, it will create unnecessary delays but the politicians know they need to settle down and get to work soon.”

Annual GDP growth slid to 4.6% last year while inflation is hovering around 10%, forcing hundreds of thousands of Nepalis to migrate overseas for jobs.

While the king was widely reviled by the time he was forced to relinquish his crown, the country’s political and economic woes have fueled nostalgia for the monarchy among some voters.

A party campaigning for the return of the monarchy, the Rastriya Prajatantra Party-Nepal (RPP-N), is now the fourth largest in parliament, but its rivals are all determined that it remains on the fringes. –

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Download the Rappler App!