International Criminal Court

ICC’s next move on the Philippines set for July 18

Lian Buan

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

ICC’s next move on the Philippines set for July 18

COURT. The facade of the International Criminal Court in The Hague, Netherlands.

File photo by Jodesz Gavilan/Rappler

(1st UPDATE) Solicitor General Menardo Guevarra says he’s ‘not too sanguine about a favorable ruling’ on the Philippine appeal against the probe
ICC’s next move on the Philippines set for July 18

The Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Court (ICC) will deliver its judgment on July 18 on whether the Court can resume investigations into former president and Davao City mayor Rodrigo Duterte’s war on drugs and alleged death squad.

“On Tuesday, 18 July 2023, at 10:00 (The Hague local time), the Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Court (ICC) will deliver, in open Court, its judgment on the appeal of the Philippines Government against ICC Pre-Trial Chamber I’s authorisation to resume the investigation of the Prosecutor,” the ICC said in a media advisory Wednesday, July 12.

It is a date earlier than expected. Rappler’s sources initially indicated the appeals decision will be handed down sometime September.

What the appeals chamber will decide is whether Prosecutor Karim Khan and his team are validly investigating the Philippine case. The appeal was filed by the Ferdinand Marcos Jr. government, particularly Solicitor General Menardo Guevarra.

In a message to Rappler on Friday, July 14, Guevarra, who serves as the Philippine government’s primary counsel, said he’s “not too sanguine about a favorable ruling” on the Philippine appeal against the probe. The solicitor general also noted that the decision of the appeals chamber would be final and not appealable under the Rome Statute. 

“The Philippine government, on the other hand, will also continue its own investigation and prosecution of alleged abuses in connection with the anti-illegal drug campaign, all in accordance with our own legal and judicial processes,” Guevarra said.

The Marcos government invoked, among others, the complementarity principle. Under this principle, the ICC should step aside if the national government is doing its own investigation into the issue. The Marcos government claims it is, while the human rights community, both at home and abroad, argues that the so-called local investigations are just for show and have not concretely achieved anything in the last three years.

If the appeals chamber validates the Prosecutor’s investigation, Khan and his team can move forward to their next step. That next step can be as simple as to continue gathering evidence, or as big as requesting for an arrest warrant or summons to be issued.

Who the warrant and summons will be for is still uncertain at this point, but Duterte has been mentioned frequently in past prosecutor and chamber reports. Duterte’s former police chief, now Senator Ronald “Bato” Dela Rosa is a frequent mention too.

The Prosecutor has not stopped investigating even as the appeals process rolled. No member of the team has stepped foot in the Philippines since Duterte’s withdrawal from the ICC’s Rome Statute.

If the appeals chamber invalidates the investigation, “the prosecutor will have to close the investigation in the Philippines,” Human Rights Watch international justice counsel Maria Elena Vignoli told Rappler.

Whatever the judgment of the appeals chamber will be, victims of the killings and their families are cautioned to expect a protracted process that can last a little while longer. 

The investigation covers the six years of Duterte’s bloody drug war, where a high estimate of 27,000 people died both in police anti-drug and vigilante operations. A previous report by former prosecutor Fatou Bensouda indicated signs of a state policy that enabled killings and coverup

The investigation also covers the alleged Davao Death Squad when Duterte was mayor and vice mayor of Davao City. Retired Davao cop Arturo Lascañas, who claims that Duterte ordered killings by the squad, has been given limited immunity by the court. – With a report from Jairo Bolledo/ Rappler.com

1 comment

Sort by
  1. ET

    That date and day: “Tuesday, 18 July 2023, at 10:00 (The Hague local time), the Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Court (ICC) will deliver, in open Court, its judgment on the appeal of the Philippines Government against ICC Pre-Trial Chamber I’s authorisation to resume the investigation of the Prosecutor,” will be eagerly awaited by many of the interested parties in the Philippines. What is noticeable and puzzling is why Solicitor General Menardo Guevarra is “not too sanguine about a favorable ruling” on the Philippine appeal against the probe? Some analysts/vloggers pointed out that this could be a preconditioning that the Marcos Administration is going to sacrifice Former President Rodrigo Duterte in its quest for a better International Image especially with the European Union (and for more aids and loans for its politico-economic pro-corruption goals?) and to warn the Imee Marcos-Arroyo-Duterte alliance to slow and/or tone down its criticisms and attacks against PBBM and his programs.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Loading
Download the Rappler App!
Face, Happy, Head

author

Lian Buan

Lian Buan is a senior investigative reporter, and minder of Rappler's justice, human rights and crime cluster.