Provide your email for confirmation

Tell us a bit about yourself

country *

Please provide your email address

welcome to Rappler

Login

To share your thoughts

Don't have an account?

Login with email

Check your inbox

We just sent a link to your inbox. Click the link to continue signing in. Can’t find it? Check your spam & junk mail.

Didn't get a link?

Sign up

Ready to get started

Already have an account?

Sign up with email

By signing up you agree to Rappler’s Terms and Conditions and Privacy

Check your inbox

We just sent a link to your inbox. Click the link to continue registering. Can’t find it? Check your spam & junk mail.

Didn't get a link?

Join Rappler+

How often would you like to pay?

Annual Subscription

Monthly Subscription

Your payment was interrupted

Exiting the registration flow at this point will mean you will loose your progress

Your payment didn’t go through

Exiting the registration flow at this point will mean you will loose your progress

welcome to Rappler+

Prosecutor junks Napoles' libel complaint vs Rappler reporter

MANILA, Philippines – More than two years after it was filed, the Taguig City Prosecutor's Office dismissed for lack of probable cause the libel complaint of alleged pork barrel scam mastermind Janet Lim Napoles against Rappler reporter Natashya Gutierrez, now Rappler Indonesia's bureau chief.

In a resolution dated November 16, 2015, Taguig City prosecutor Laarni Fabella said the stories written by Gutierrez in July 2013 were "neither defamatory nor malicious."

"Respondent merely made a factual statement based on available informations, without even giving her opinion and the source of which are from Jean's own blog which were made available to the public in the first place," the prosecutor said.

She added, "There being no element of malice, we find that there is no probable cause to charge respondent with libel."

In August 2013, Napoles sued Gutierrez, then a multimedia reporter of Rappler, for writing about the lavish lifestyle and P80 million luxury condominium owned by her daughter, Jeane. She wanted Gutierrez to pay P10 million in damages and attorney's fees for allegedly causing her family "grave humiliation and distress."

In her complaint, Napoles also said that Jeane had to be hospitalized due to the stress that the articles supposedly caused her.

Napoles also filed libel complaints against the Philippine Daily Inquirer,  lawyer-blogger Berteni Causing, and fashion designer Eduardo “Eddie” Baddeo.

In her counter-affidavit filed in September 2013, Gutierrez said the libel complaint was baseless, saying she did not "act with malice" in reporting Jeane's lifestyle.

Gutierrez said her stories were factual statements based on previous media reports and statements, public records, as well as photos that Jeane herself uploaded online. Her lawyer is La Salle Law Dean Jose Manuel Diokno, a longtime human rights lawyer.

"I did not act with malice but with good reason and justifiable motive. Since Janet Napoles is a public figure and the matter is one of public interest, Janet must show the presence of actual malice for her complaint to prosper," Gutierrez said. (READ: Napoles lawyer threatens, Rappler replies)

The detained Mrs Napoles is accused of running fake non-governmental organizations to siphon off billions of lawmakers' development funds. In April 2015, she was sentenced to reclusion perpetua for illegally detaning Benhur Luy, her relative and former assistant who became the whistleblower on the scam. – Katerina Francisco/Rappler.com