Supreme Court junks Calida’s quo warranto vs ABS-CBN Corp for being moot

Lian Buan

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

Supreme Court junks Calida’s quo warranto vs ABS-CBN Corp for being moot
(UPDATED) The case against ABS-CBN Convergence remains. ABS-CBN's shutdown is also still in effect.

MANILA, Philippines (2nd UPDATE) – The Supreme Court en banc on Tuesday, June 23, dismissed Solicitor General Jose Calida’s quo warranto petition against ABS-CBN Corporation for being moot, sources confirmed to Rappler.

Calida filed the quo warranto petition last February 10, alleging that ABS-CBN Corporation and Convergence violated terms of their franchises.

Sources told Rappler that the petition has become moot because ABS-CBN Corporation’s franchise already expired on May 4. ABS-CBN Channel 2 went off air on May 5 after the National Telecommunications Commission (NTC) issued a cease and desist order against it.

The junking does not affect ABS-CBN’s petition for Temporary Restraining Order (TRO), or the total voiding of the NTC’s cease and desist order, which is handled by a different justice-in-charge, meaning that the shutdown is still in effect.

Malacañang ‘respects’ decision

Malacañang said it “respects” the decision of the High Court. 

“We  leave it to the Solicitor-General as the Petitioner to decine on his next legal steps,” said Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque.

The Duterte spokesman said the executive branch also leaves it to Congress to decide on the franchise renewal of ABS-CBN.

“We consider this a prerogative of Congress, which is presently deliberating on the matter,” said Roque.

ABS-CBN Convergence

The same sources said the petition insofar as ABS-CBN Convergence is concerned is still pending. But the franchise of ABS-CBN Convergence, which operates ABS-CBN Mobile, also already expired. In fact it expired on March 17, before the franchise of ABS-CBN Corporation expired.

In a disclosure to the stock exchange, ABS-CBN Corporation said “in the meantime, Convergence has suspended operations which require a legislative franchise or provisional authority.”

Supreme Court Spokesperson Brian Keith Hosaka later confirmed the actions of the en banc.

Asked why the case against ABS-CBN Convergence was retained despite its franchise also having expired, Hosaka said: “Let us wait for the resolution of the court on this matter, as for the reason for their action.”

The petition for TRO is scheduled for another round of SC deliberations on July 13.

By July 13, ABS-CBN would have been shut for more than two months, losing up to P35 a million a day since shutdown. ABS-CBN president and CEO Carlo Katigbak earlier told lawmakers that the network may have to begin retrenching some of its workers by August if it is not allowed to operate by then.

Franchise hearings in the House of Representatives are still ongoing, and are stalled as lawmakers dwell on the citizenship of ABS-CBN Chairman Emeritus Gabby Lopez despite a Department of Justice (DOJ) declaration that he is a Filipino citizen.

The ABS-CBN case has created a deadlock among the 3 branches of government, with legal experts differing on interpretations on which branch would have the last say. –

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Download the Rappler App!
Face, Happy, Head


Lian Buan

Lian Buan is a senior investigative reporter, and minder of Rappler's justice, human rights and crime cluster.