Philippine media

QC court orders NTC to unblock Bulatlat’s website

Jairo Bolledo

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

QC court orders NTC to unblock Bulatlat’s website

AT WORK. Bulatlat journalist Carlo Manalansan interviewing an Aeta woman from the communities in Capas, Tarlac, affected by the construction of the disputed New Clark City.

Courtesy of

The Quezon City RTC Branch 306 issues a writ of preliminary injunction temporarily suspending a National Telecommunications Commission memo that blocked Bulatlat's website

MANILA, Philippines – The Quezon City Regional Trial Court (RTC) Branch 306 has granted alternative news site Bulatlat’s plea to temporarily unblock its website.

In a decision on Thursday, August 11, the Quezon City court granted Bulatlat’s plea for the issuance of a writ of preliminary injunction to temporarily suspend the National Telecommunications Commission (NTC)’s memorandum, which blocked the website.

QC court orders NTC to unblock Bulatlat’s website

A writ of preliminary injunction is an order granted at any stage of the legal action or prior to the final order, which requires a party, court, agency, or a person to refrain from performing a particular act or acts.

Must Read

Bulatlat seeks to unblock its website, asks court to nullify NTC memo

Bulatlat seeks to unblock its website, asks court to nullify NTC memo

“The issuance of the writ is conditioned upon plaintiff’s posting of a bond in the amount of One Hundred Thousand Pesos (P100,000.00), either in cash or by surety, which shall answer for the damages the defendants would suffer by reason of the injunction in case the plaintiff is found to be not entitled thereto,” the resolution issued by Judge Dolly Rose Bolante-Prado said.

After issuance, the writ will remain effective until “final adjudication of the merits of the main case has been made.” Since Bulatlat’s plea for writ of preliminary injunction has been granted by the court, its motion for reconsideration of the order denying its application for a temporary restraining order is now moot and academic, the resolution added.

Before the end of former president Rodrigo Duterte’s term, his national security adviser Hermogenes Esperon Jr. asked the NTC to block Bulatlat and Pinoy Weekly’s websites. The former security official used the draconian anti-terror law and justified the blocking by citing excerpts from Pinoy Weekly that mentioned armed struggle and the communist insurgency.

QC court orders NTC to unblock Bulatlat’s website
Right to free speech, press as bases

In explaining the decision, Prado highlighted at least two requisites why Bulatlat was granted the writ.

The decision explained that Bulatlat was able to prove that it has a “clear and unmistakable” right to be protected by the Constitution under the freedom of speech and of the press. Prado noted that these freedoms include the right to publish opinion and commentaries and disseminate them.

The same principle was used by Bulatlat in the filing of case to justify that the NTC order indeed violated their constitutional rights. The alternative news organization cited Article 3, Section 4 of the 1987 Constitution.

Prado also noted that Bulatlat was able to prove that there was “a material and substantial invasion of its right.” The judge said the news organization was able to establish that after the NTC memorandum took effect, Bulatlat’s website was no longer accessible.

Must Read

Bulatlat losing half its readers to ‘terror’ block, but judge says that’s not urgent

Bulatlat losing half its readers to ‘terror’ block, but judge says that’s not urgent

According to the resolution, the editorial staff could not access and upload stories on their website without using a virtual private network, and their subscribers also could not access the same. This was a violation of the right to free speech and press freedom, the resolution said, since the publishers’ and readers’ access to the website was limited.

Weeks after the enforcement of the NTC memorandum, Bulatlat said it had lost half of its readership.

“To the Court, any limitation or restriction in the exercise of one’s right, no matter the extent, and for even minimal periods of time, is a form of deprivation, and, clearly, a violation of such right,” the resolution said. –

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Download the Rappler App!
Avatar photo


Jairo Bolledo

Jairo Bolledo is a multimedia reporter at Rappler covering justice, police, and crime.