DOCUMENT: Dissenting opinions on Bong Revilla acquittal

Rappler.com

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

DOCUMENT: Dissenting opinions on Bong Revilla acquittal
Read the full dissents of Associate Justices Efren de la Cruz and Ma Theresa Dolores Gomez-Estoesta

FREE. Former senator Ramon 'Bong' Revilla Jr arrives at the Sandiganbayan on Friday, December 7, 2018, for the promulgation of judgment on his plunder case. He is acquitted. Photo by Darren Langit/Rappler

MANILA, Philippines – The two dissenters of the Sandiganbayan Special First Division maintained that convicted Richard Cambe could not have executed the elaborate pork barrel scam without the help of his boss, former senator Ramon “Bong” Revilla Jr.

“I find it hard to believe that this scam of such magnitude was confined only within the realm of Napoles and Cambe to the exclusion of Revilla,” First Division chairman and Associate Justice Efren de la Cruz said.

De la Cruz also noted that the company of Revilla’s wife, Lani Mercado, received sums amounting to P27.745 million in deposits, “most of which were done proximate to the time Cambe received cash from [whistle-blower Benhur] Luy, and during the period when the company had no operations.”

For her part, Associate Justice Ma. Theresa Dolores Gomez-Estoesta said in her dissent: “One need only turn a discerning eye, and not look the other way.” 

Estoesta said the conclusion that the forgery dealt “a great blow to the prosecution came as rather swift.” She also said: “The unexplained wealth of Senator Revilla is one glaring fact, left unrelated, to gloss over.”

The “consequential ruin” of faulty reasoning on the part of the majority “may eventually free a man once accused of having conspired in raiding the public treasury to hundreds of millions,” Estoesta’s strongly worded opinion said.

You may read the two dissenting opinions in full below:

Associate Justice Estoesta’s dissent:

 

Associate Justice Efren de la Cruz’s concurring and dissenting opinion:

 

Rappler.com

READ related stories:

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI
Download the Rappler App!