climate change

[OPINION] US, biggest bully and blocker of climate action

Lidy Nacpil

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

[OPINION] US, biggest bully and blocker of climate action

Alejandro Edoria/Rappler

'The United States is the largest emitter of greenhouse gases. A report on the world’s key emitters found that the US has cumulatively produced more CO2 than any other nation.'

The US was notably absent at the recent United Nations Secretary-General’s Climate Ambition Summit. With two months left until the global climate talks called COP28, the summit was an important space for world leaders to bring their ambitious and concrete plans to fight climate change. US President Biden opted to send his climate envoy John Kerry, who did not speak because only leaders from nations with concrete plans to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions were given three minutes to address the gathering.

The world’s biggest emitter remains lacking in bold, new climate commitments and action. It is also behind in the delivery of its climate finance obligations. After this summit, we shall once again see the US fail to rise to the moment. The Second Pledging Conference of the Green Climate Fund (GCF) is happening on October 5 in Bonn, Germany. Governments of the Global North are expected to announce their increased climate finance contributions in this conference.

The US government, represented by President Biden, is the biggest bully and blocker of climate action. Despite the worsening climate crisis, the US is yet to deliver on its climate finance obligations while expanding fossil fuel production and continuing with domestic fossil fuel subsidies. In the years 2020 and 2021, it provided at least $165.89 billion worth of conditional and unconditional subsidies for fossil fuels. 

The United States is the largest emitter of greenhouse gases. A report on the world’s key emitters found that the US has cumulatively produced more CO2 than any other nation, contributing more to human-caused climate change than any other nation over the course of history. 

Countries in the Global South that have the least contribution to the crisis suffer the worst impacts. Communities in Asia are suffering massive losses and damage. These countries have been demanding the US government to urgently deliver adequate, non-debt-creating, unconditional, and predictable climate finance through the financial mechanisms under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Instead, the US promotes false and highly politicized finance solutions in international climate spaces. 

Climate finance is an obligation and part of reparations for historical and continuing harms and injustices. Under the UNFCCC, countries in the Global North, including the US, are responsible for providing climate finance to the Global South. A report estimates that the US owes at least $80 trillion in Climate Debt to developing countries based on their climate fair share. 

The Transitional Committee on Loss and Damage Finance, created last November 2022 by the Conference of Parties (COP) to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, is now working on recommendations on the operationalization of the Loss and Damage Fund (LDF) for consideration and adoption by the upcoming COP28. The COP27 climate summit finally made a decision to establish the fund, a longstanding demand of vulnerable developing countries and climate justice movements. It is aimed at providing finance to cover loss and damage in developing countries.   

For a long time the US had blocked the establishment of the LDF, and had opposed any inclusion about liability and compensation for loss and damage in climate agreements. Last July, during a hearing before a House of Representatives foreign affairs committee on whether the US would pay countries that have been damaged by floods, storms, and other climate-driven disasters, Kerry said the US says it will not “under any circumstances” pay reparations to developing countries.

Recently, the US proposed to the Transitional Committee to have the LDF as a Financial Intermediary Fund (FIF) under the auspices of the World Bank, rather than as an independent and democratically-accessible fund under the guidance of the COP. This means that the World Bank will be in charge of raising, directing, and disbursing all funding for the LDF. The US is also pushing to resource the LDF through loans from multilateral development banks (MDBs), proceeds from carbon trading, and other financial arrangements. 

Approximately $2.8 trillion will be needed annually by the Global South in 2030 to mitigate its GHG emissions and roughly $300 billion annually for resilience-building and adaptation. Estimates for economic losses and damages from worsening climate impacts are also projected to range from $400 to $900 billion annually by 2030. These figures are poised to surge if climate finance remains insufficient, delayed, and unresponsive to the pressing climate needs of the Global South.

Given the urgency of the climate crisis, the fund must be operationalized as soon as possible. Rich countries largely responsible for warming our planet should immediately mobilize substantial new and non-debt-creating climate finance to pay for climate-related damage in vulnerable countries, as well as for reparations for the huge climate debt owed by governments of the Global North to the Global South

In addition to the US’ intransigence are its broken promises: the US government has only provided $1 billion out of its already highly inadequate $3 billion pledge to the Green Climate Fund (GCF), a commitment announced during the Obama administration. During the 2021 Climate Leaders’ Summit convened by the Biden administration, the US promised to mobilize $11 billion in Climate Finance for developing countries by 2024. However, in the fiscal year 2024 budget proposal submitted to the US Congress, only $6 billion in “development assistance” was requested for the USAID and no new and additional funds through the GCF and other finance mechanisms under the UNFCCC.

The US’ bullying and deception have long plagued climate negotiations. To build momentum on climate action, we have to fight the bully. Delayed climate action means more loss and damage and, consequently, sky-high loss and damage finance. –

Lidy Nacpil is coordinator of Asian Peoples’ Movement on Debt and Development (APMDD).

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Download the Rappler App!