2023 barangay and SK elections

Comelec warns postponing 2022 barangay, SK polls would mean additional costs

Dwight de Leon

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

Comelec warns postponing 2022 barangay, SK polls would mean additional costs

POLL CHIEF. Then-Comelec commissioner George Garcia during the start of the local absentee voting at the Comelec office in Intramuros, Manila, on April 27, 2022.


The House suffrage panel, however, still votes to move the December 2022 barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan elections to December 2023

MANILA, Philippines – The House suffrage panel approved a motion seeking to postpone the December 2022 barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan (SK) elections to December 2023, even after the Commission on Elections (Comelec) warned that doing so would lead to additional costs.

Comelec warns postponing 2022 barangay, SK polls would mean additional costs

Facing the House suffrage panel on Tuesday, August 16, Comelec Chairman George Garcia explained that if the polls do not push through by year-end, the poll body would have to resume the continuing voter registration by October, resulting in the need for a bigger budget and more voting materials.

“We have P8.449-billion [budget] right now. If we are going to postpone the elections and increase the honorarium of poll watchers, on the assumption that Congress will be kind enough to increase the honorarium, plus the expenses for the continuing voter registration and such other additional [expenses], we need another P5 billion,” Garcia said.

“We in the Comelec will just abide by the mandate of Congress and the executive as far as postponing the elections is concerned, whether May 2023 or December 2023. Just not 2024 because by that time, we will be preparing for the 2025 elections,” he added.

Comelec warns postponing 2022 barangay, SK polls would mean additional costs

Thirty-eight bills have been filed seeking to defer the conduct of the polls originally scheduled on December 5, due to a number of reasons, the most common of which are:

  • to save money as the country recovers from the pandemic, and allot the P8.4 billion worth of funds for COVID-19 response instead
  • to allow continuity in government operations at the barangay level, since village officials are supposedly already knowledgeable about COVID-19 protocols
  • to allow the government to “heal” after the divisive May 2022 elections

After Garcia’s explanation about the financial obstacles that would arise should the barangay polls be postponed, some lawmakers raised concerns over the additional expenses that would emerge.

“Based on the explanation of the proponents, some of them were mentioning we would be able to save money. Basically, we won’t,” Quezon City 3rd District Representative Franz Pumaren said.

“We should not always say that if we postpone the elections, we would save the money, or the P8 billion could help gear up the economy, especially since we are just recovering from the pandemic,” Quezon City 6th District Representative Marivic Co-Pilar also said. “If we postpone, not too long.”

Other congressmen, however, were undeterred by the additional costs.

“On the issue of savings, we really would not be able to save. We can use this as a quick fix, we need more funds to fight the pandemic,” House Deputy Speaker and Pampanga 3rd District Representative Aurelio Gonzales said.

“If it is postponed, [let’s ask] how much the government would earn if we reallocate the P8-billion budget,” Quezon City 4th District Representative Marvin Rillo argued. “It’s a bit premature to say we would lose P5 billion. You look at the bigger picture.”

Watchdogs, minority lawmakers against postponement

The House suffrage panel invited watchdogs Legal Network for Truthful Elections (Lente), National Citizens’ Movement for Free Elections, and Parish Pastoral Council for Responsible Voting during Tuesday’s hearing, with all three opposing the deferment of the barangay polls.

“When elections are postponed, the right of the people to accept or reject their leaders is also postponed. The pandemic highlighted the role of the barangay. The elections would be a good opportunity for people to reward high-performing barangay officials,” Lente policy consultant Carlo Africa said.

Must Read

Why watchdogs oppose postponing December 2022 barangay, SK elections

Why watchdogs oppose postponing December 2022 barangay, SK elections

Kabataan Representative Raoul Manuel and ACT Teachers Representative France Castro were the only lawmakers to vote against the committee motion to move the barangay and youth council polls to the first Monday of December 2023. Twelve others voted in favor of postponement.

“Since the terms of office of the barangay and SK officials are already over, it’s as if we are the ones appointing them. We overstep the principle of making people choose for their representatives,” Castro said.

The Philippines has had a recent history of postponing the barangay and SK elections repeatedly.

The October 2016 polls were first moved to October 2017, then deferred again to May 2018, when it finally pushed through.

The subsequent barangay elections should have been held in May 2020, but in December 2019, then-president Rodrigo Duterte signed a measure postponing the elections to December 5, 2022. Senator Imee Marcos, who sponsored the bill in the upper chamber, had said the move would save the government some P5.7 billion. – Rappler.com

All quotes in Filipino were translated to English.

Add a comment

Sort by

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

Summarize this article with AI

How does this make you feel?

Download the Rappler App!
Avatar photo


Dwight de Leon

Dwight de Leon is a multimedia reporter who covers President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., the Malacañang, and the Commission on Elections for Rappler.