Claim: The Marcos family was not able to respond to the estate tax case filed against them because they were all still in the United States when it was filed.
On the 38:21 timestamp of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.’s interview with Toni Gonzaga aired on September 13, 2022, he said: “We were never allowed to argue because when this case came out, we were all in the United States.”
Why we fact-checked this: The claim was made by President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. in his interview with Toni Gonzaga on September 13, 2022, which already has over 163,000 reactions, 17,660 comments, and 2,000,000 views on YouTube, as of writing.
Already in the country: According to a 1994 Court of Appeals (CA) decision affirmed by the Supreme Court in 1997, Ferdinand Marcos Jr. was already congressman of the 2nd District of Ilocos Norte when the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) sent copies of the deficiency tax assessments to him.
- Snubbed: The decision said that “the deficiency tax assessments were not protested administratively, by Mrs. Marcos and the other heirs of the late president, within 30 days from service of said assessments.”
Court-established facts: The CA decision, adopted by the Supreme Court (SC), cited a total of 30 Notices of Levy issued by the BIR on the following dates:
- 22 Notices of Levy on real property against certain parcels of land owned by the Marcoses were issued on February 22, 1993.
- 4 Notices of Levy on real property were issued for the purpose of satisfying the deficiency income taxes on May 20, 1993.
- 4 Notices of Levy on real property were again issued on May 26, 1993.
The court decision said: “We cannot, therefore, countenance petitioner’s insistence that he was denied due process.”
Simply ignored: Former SC justice Antonio Carpio said in a Philippine Daily Inquirer column published on September 30, 2021, that “the BIR made sure that proper notices were given to Imelda Marcos” and “the Marcos heirs simply ignored all the notices sent by the BIR.”
“The Marcos heirs simply ignored all the notices sent by the BIR. However, when the BIR served notices to the Marcos heirs that real properties in the name of Ferdinand Marcos would be auctioned off to pay the estate tax, Bongbong Marcos filed a petition with the Court of Appeals questioning the validity of the estate tax assessment on the flimsy ground that the BIR had no jurisdiction over the assets of the deceased Marcos because the assets were in the custody of the probate court.”
“The Court of Appeals dismissed Bongbong Marcos’s petition on the ground that the estate tax assessment had already become ‘final and unappealable,’” Carpio said. – Lorenz Pasion/Rappler.com
Keep us aware of suspicious Facebook pages, groups, accounts, websites, articles, or photos in your network by contacting us at firstname.lastname@example.org. You may also report dubious claims to #FactsFirstPH tipline by messaging Rappler on Facebook or Newsbreak via Twitter direct message. You may also report through our Viber fact check chatbot. Let us battle disinformation one Fact Check at a time.